MODULE2
Authors : Patrice Dosset, Martin Blackledge
Institut de Biologie Structurale, Grenoble, France
Developed in the context of EU NMR Joint Research
Project JRA3 ORIENTING NMR
Analysis of residual anisotropic
interactions measured in proteins and nucleic acids aligned in dilute liquid
crystalline media.
Version 2
– Allows for the analysis of residual
chemical shifts due to non-averaged chemical shift anisotropy.
– Allows for the analysis and
comparison of multiple data sets measured for the same molecule.
– Allow for output of fitted data into
external files (bug-fix).
– Allows for cursor selection of
RDC/RCS between peptide units aswell as within peptide units.
For residual dipolar coupling based
analysis see main manual in download package.
The executable is currently for
Linux machines. A Macintosh executable will be available shortly.

Data format :
3 C 4 N
-5.5975 1.0000
4 C 5 N
-56.3931
1.0000
5 C 6 N
-88.1987
1.0000
6 C 7 N
-35.2552
1.0000
10 C 11 N
-0.0012 1.0000
11 C 12 N
12.2747 1.0000
12 C 13 N
34.8201 1.0000
13 C 14 N
62.4405 1.0000
14 C 15 N
-56.8725
1.0000
Two atoms identify the nucleus for
which the CSA is to be taken into account.
The first atom is the appropriate
nucleus. The second defines the neighbour with respect to which the angle q describing the orientation of the tensor eigenvalues
in the plane. In the case shown the CSA is for the Carbonyl carbon and the
orientation of the eigenvalues of the CSA tensor is defined by the angle q, defined by a
clockwise rotation about the norm with respect to the plane, relative to the
vector C-N (see figure).
The experimental value is shown in
ppb. The uncertainty is in the final column.
1) Fitting of residual anisotropic
interactions : Either Chemical shifts, dipolar couplings or both can be
included in the fit

2) Fitting of residual anisotropic
interactions : Either alignment tensor or average chemical shift tensors can be
fit to the data.

The eigenvalues and eigenvectors can
be either set by the use or fit. The precision of the parameter determination
can be estimated using Monte Carlo simulations.

3) Standard RDC analysis – as
in MODULE Vsn 1 (see manual for version 1).
RCSA analysis is presented in a very
similar way :

4) Once the data have been read,
they are identified above, or between the appropriate parts of the primary
sequence using the Visualisation menu as points Ô.Õ for RDCs and circumflex Ô^Õ
for RCSA data. They can be individually selected using the cursor and the data
fitting menus. The molecule can of course be dissected into different domains
to analyze the fitting these domains and to reorient with respect to a common
alignment frame.

5) Fitting of the CSA tensors. It is
not possible to fit the alignment and CSA tensors to the same data when there
are no RDC data available (in this case the solution is not defined). But in
the case where RDC data are available you can fit both tensors. Individual
components of the tensor (either eigenvectors or the orientation of the
eigenvectors in the peptide plane), or all three parmeters, can be fitted. The
results of the fit can be examined in the text window from which the program was
run. The quality of the fitting can be examined in the Visualisation
Correlation menu, as for RDC analysis. Of course it is possible to determine
the optimal CSA tensor for different domains of the molecule, for example for
alpha helices or for beta sheets as in the example below :



Some references to the use of residual CSA measurement and
analysis in proteins and nucleic acids (a non-exhaustive list) :
W.Y. Choy, M.
Tollinger, G.A. Mueller, et al. Direct structure refinement of high molecular
weight proteins against residual dipolar couplings and carbonyl chemical shift
changes upon alignment: an application to maltose binding protein. J. Biomol.
NMR 21, (2001) 31-40
N. Lancelot, K.
Elbayed, M Piotto. Applications of variable-angle sample spinning experiments
to the measurement of scaled residual dipolar couplings and N-15 CSA in soluble
proteins J. Biomol. NMR 33, (2005) 153-161
G. Cornilescu, A. Bax, Measurement of proton,
nitrogen, and carbonyl chemical shielding anisotropies in a protein dissolved
in a dilute liquid crystalline, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 (2000), 10143–10154.
J. Boyd, C. Redfield, Characterization of 15N
chemical shift anisotropy from orientation-dependent changes to 15N chemical
shifts in dilute bicelle solutions, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121 (1999), 7441–7442.
G. Cornilescu, J. Marquardt, M. Ottiger, A. Bax,
Validation of protein structure from anisotropic carbonyl chemical shifts in a
dilute liquid crystalline phase, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120 (1998), 6836–6837.
J. Kurita, H. Shimahara, N. Utsunomiya-Tate, S.
Tate, Measurement of 15N chemical shift anisotropy in a protein dissolved in a
dilute liquid crystalline medium with the application of magic angle sample
spinning, J. Magn. Reson. 163 (2003),
163–173.
A. Grishaev, JF Ying,
A. Bax. Pseudo-CSA restraints for NMR refinement of nucleic acid structure. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 31, (2006) 10010-10011.
G. Bouvignies, S. Meier, S. Grzesiek and M. Blackledge.
Ultra-High Resolution Backbone Structure of Perdeuterated Protein GB1 using Residual
Dipolar Couplings from Two Alignment Media. Angewandte Chemie International
Edition. 45, (2006) 8166-8169.